Works for any time-dependant prediction task β€’ Finance, ML, Sales, Weather, Energy

Did Your Predictions
Actually Work?

Stop measuring how close you were. Start measuring if you would have won.

For research and educational purposes only. Not financial, investment, or trading advice.

πŸ“Š

Upload Your Predictions

Drop any CSV with predictions & actual outcomes (6 columns maximum)
Works for stocks, sales, weather, sports-anything

πŸ“₯ Download Example CSV

Your Results

Success Score
-
How useful these predictions actually are

πŸ“ˆ Forecast vs Actuals

Actuals stay visually dominant, the strongest forecast stays emphasized, and weaker candidates remain visible without taking over the chart.

Forecast Comparison

Direction Accuracy
-
Did you predict up/down correctly?
Profit Score
-
If you acted on these, would you win?
Efficiency Ratio
-
Balance of usefulness vs accuracy
Risk Score
-
Reward relative to downside risk
Worst Case
-
Biggest mistake in your predictions

What's the Success Score?

Think of it like this: If you bet money on your predictions, would you make profit?

Why Not Just "Accuracy"?

Being close isn't enough. Wrong direction can lose money.

Who Uses This?

Anyone who needs predictions that work, not just look good on paper.

What To Do Next

Move from evaluation into advisory or execution.

Next layer

Decision Intelligence

Diagnose the dataset, select the target, assess dataset health, and get a structured model path before training.

Open Decision Intelligence
Execution layer

AutoML

Carry forward the recommended shortlist, benchmark concrete candidates, and keep execution aligned with the upstream decision flow.

Open AutoML

Real Examples That Make Sense

This works for any prediction, not just finance

πŸ“ˆ Stock Trading

Scenario: You predict a stock at $101, it goes to $99.
Traditional: "Close! Only 2% error."
Quantsynth: "Wrong direction = you lost money."

☁️ Weather Forecasting

Scenario: You predict 75Β°F, actual is 73Β°F.
Traditional: "Good job!"
Quantsynth: "Did people bring jackets? That's what matters."

πŸ€ Sports Betting

Scenario: You predict a 10-point win, they win by 3.
Traditional: "Pretty close!"
Quantsynth: "You predicted a win and they won = profit."

πŸ’Ό Sales Forecasting

Scenario: Predict $100K sales, actual is $80K.
Traditional: "20% error"
Quantsynth: "Did you overstaff? That costs real money."

πŸ€– ML Model Selection

Scenario: Model A: 95% accurate. Model B: 88% accurate.
Traditional: "Pick A"
Quantsynth: "Which one makes fewer expensive mistakes?"

🏠 Real Estate

Scenario: Predict price increase, it decreases 5%.
Traditional: "Small error"
Quantsynth: "Wrong direction = you bought at the peak."

Why Traditional Metrics Miss The Point

Comparing what matters vs what gets measured

WHAT MATTERS TRADITIONAL APPROACH QUANTSYNTH APPROACH
Getting Direction Right βœ• Completely ignored (only cares about distance) βœ“ Primary focus (80% of success)
Actual Success Rate βœ• No connection to outcomes βœ“ Directly measures if it works
When You're Wrong βœ• Big mistakes kill your score βœ“ Understands some errors matter more
Confidence Levels βœ• Treats all predictions equally βœ“ Rewards being confident when right
Real-World Use βœ• Great metrics, bad decisions βœ“ Optimizes for actual utility

Metrics That Reflect Real Outcomes

Not how close your predictions were β€” but how useful they actually are

🎯

Forecast Investment Score (FIS)

FIS measures whether a prediction would have led to a good decision. Instead of rewarding forecasts for being close to the target, it rewards them for being right in the moments that matter.

  • Correct direction matters more than small numerical errors
  • Consistent signals are trusted more than lucky ones
  • Weak or non-committal predictions are penalized
How to read it:
FIS ranges from 0 to 1. Higher values mean the prediction behaves like a reliable, decision-ready signal.
βš–οΈ

Confidence–Efficiency Ratio (CER)

CER answers a different question: How much confidence do you earn per unit of error? It balances how strong a prediction is with how efficiently it achieves that strength.

  • Rewards confident forecasts that justify their errors
  • Penalizes noisy or inefficient predictions
  • Comparable across different problems and scales
How to read it:
Higher CER means the model delivers trustworthy confidence without excessive error.

How These Metrics Work Together

FIS tells you whether a prediction is worth acting on. CER tells you whether that confidence is efficiently earned. Together, they reveal why traditional accuracy metrics can be misleading.

See The Difference in Action

How traditional metrics get fooled by common prediction patterns

⚠️ The Lagged Predictor

This model just predicts yesterday's price. It's incredibly common (moving averages, momentum strategies) and looks great on traditional metrics because it's "always close." But it's completely untradeable.

Sample Predictions:
Day 1: Predict $100 β†’ Actual $102
Day 2: Predict $102 β†’ Actual $98
Day 3: Predict $98 β†’ Actual $103
Day 4: Predict $103 β†’ Actual $101
Why it fails:

By the time you get the signal, the move already happened. You're always entering after the profitable moment. It's like reading yesterday's news.

METRIC COMPARISON

RΒ² Score 0.92

βœ“ "Excellent fit!"

MAE 1.8

βœ“ "Very accurate!"

FIS Score 0.02

βœ• "Worthless for trading"

Real Trading Result: You'd lose money on transaction costs alone. Every trade is a day late.

Built for Professional Use

The transparency and privacy you need for sensitive data

πŸ”’

Privacy First

Predictions processed in-memory. We evaluate your utility, we don't steal your alpha. No data storage, no tracking, no leaks.

πŸ“

Open Methodology

Math is documented. Implementation stays private. You know what we do, just not how we optimize it.

πŸ“Š

Full Transparency

Download reports include all the necessary data to complete your analysis. No black boxes.

βœ“

Statistically Validated

50,000+ Monte Carlo simulations. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Peer-reviewed methodology. Not guesswork.

Β© 2026 – Francisco Cardoso. All rights reserved.

The content of this website, including design, code, models, text, graphics, and displayed results, is protected under applicable copyright and intellectual property laws. Unauthorized reproduction, modification, reverse engineering, systematic data extraction, or use for competitive purposes without prior written consent from the owner is strictly prohibited.

Privacy Β· Terms Β· LinkedIn